PRAC 6568 WEEK 11 ASSIGNMENT: REASSESSMENT OF STRENGTHS AND OPPORTUNITIES
There is a saying that “people must look back in order to look forward.” As you transition out of this practicum, finish your program, and look forward to your career beyond the program, you must “look back” at all that you have accomplished, taking stock of your skill and confidence levels before moving on.
For this Assignment, you return to your Week 1 Self-Assessment to gain a new perspective on what you need to do moving forward.
Resources
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To prepare:
- Review your completed Clinical Skills and Procedures Self-Assessment Form from Week 1, as well as the record of procedures you have performed throughout the practicum.
Assignment (1 page)
- Perform a new self-assessment. Rate yourself on clinical skills, based on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results.
- Explain which goals you accomplished and which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance and grow in your career.
By Day 7
Submit your completed Assignment.
submission information
Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.
- To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK11Assgn+last name+first initial.
- Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
- Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.
Rubric
PRAC_6568_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
|
PRAC_6568_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePerform a new self-assessment, rating yourself on clinical skills based
on your experiences during this practicum. Summarize the results.
|
45 to
>40.0 ptsExcellentThe response provides an
accurate, clear, and complete summary.
40 to
>35.5 ptsGoodThe response provides an accurate
summary.
35.5 to
>31.0 ptsFairThe response provides a somewhat
vague, inaccurate, or incomplete summary.
31 to
>0 ptsPoorThe response provides a vague,
inaccurate, or incomplete summary, or the summary is missing.
|
45 pts
|
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExplain which goals you accomplished and
which you did not. If you did not achieve a particular goal, explain how you
could continue to work on it after you complete your program, as you advance
and grow in your career.
|
40 to
>35.0 ptsExcellentThe response accurately and
thoroughly explains in detail which goals were accomplished and which were
not. Full explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.
35 to
>31.0 ptsGoodThe response accurately explains
which goals were accomplished and which were not. Explanation is provided for
how to continue working on goals.
31 to
>27.0 ptsFairThe response somewhat vaguely or
inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not. Vague
explanation is provided for how to continue working on goals.
27 to
>0 ptsPoorThe response vaguely or
inaccurately explains which goals were accomplished and which were not, or
explanation is missing. Vague explanation is provided for how to continue
working on goals, or explanation is missing.
|
40 pts
|
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and
Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas,
flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and
lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and
introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
|
5 to
>4.0 ptsExcellentParagraphs and sentences
follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and
comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided
which delineates all required criteria.
4 to
>3.5 ptsGoodParagraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose,
introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and
not descriptive.
3.5 to
>3.0 ptsFairParagraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off
topic.
3 to
>0 ptsPoorParagraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the
time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
|
5 pts
|
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Student
uses correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
|
5 to
>4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct grammar,
spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 to
>3.5 ptsGoodContains one or two (1 or 2)
grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 to
>3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 to
>0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.
|
5 pts
|
|
This
criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting: The paper
follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,
indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference
list.
|
5 to
>4.0 ptsExcellentUses correct APA format with
no errors.
4 to
>3.5 ptsGoodContains a one or two (1 or 2) APA
format errors.
3.5 to
>3.0 ptsFairContains several (3 or 4) APA
format errors.
3 to
>0 ptsPoorContains many (≥ 5) APA format
errors.
|
5 pts
|
RELATED: CJUS 231 Research Paper: Case Report Assignment Instructions
